Homenagem Ana Picasso

[X-static]

Tens aqui este artigo já de Maio passado:

 

ARM tests: Intel flops on Android compatibility, Windows power

 

(...)

Bottom line number one, Watt said, is that Android apps written using ARM's 32-bit ARMv7 architecture and converted to run on x86 Android on Intel hardware using binary translation suffer from poor performance and long load times, and cause poor battery life.

 

Bottom line number two is that despite Intel's mobile-processor advances, ARM-based SoC's still draw considerably less power than Intel chips, even when taking into account Intel's long history with Windows optimization and the fact that the Atom he tested was baked in a 22nm process and the Snapdragon in a less power-efficient 28nm process.

 

Or, as ARM's Watt put it more succinctly, "We're still beating 'em."

 

[Perks]

Sim, mas agora com o 5.0 as coisas podem ter mudado, não sei