Jump to content

Notícias Variadas sobre Temas em Geral


GODfromage
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, GODfromage said:

Tendo em conta que ele tinha um mandato de captura, inocente ou não, por ter andado a fugir não vai "comer" por isso? 

Seria uma palhaçada se não comesse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

O circo mediático que essa criatura montou , ainda por cima com a conivência do canal público e das forças de segurança , fdx que vergonha , e isto num país dito desenvolvido e democrático. . . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Este magnifico episódio da sandra felgueiras mete-me nojo.. como é possível fazerem esta palhaçada toda?? que bem utilizados que estão a ser os nossos impostos fds

Entre os advogados (3 pelo que dizem), está uma manhosa que conseguiu ilibar a uns anos uma inspectora da PJ acusada de matar a sogra com uma data de tiros.. este vai pelo mesmo caminho.

 

Nem tenho palavras para descrever esta situação.. mas uma coisa é certa a PJ e GNR foram bem fdds com esta história, telefonema em directo para o próprio director da PJ..que vergonha de país.. ou muito me engano ou os advogados já engendraram uma história tal que o tipo com jeitinho nem preso vai tal é o estado de vítima que querem fazer parecer.. que vergonha :ranting:

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, And0 said:

Este magnifico episódio da sandra felgueiras mete-me nojo.. como é possível fazerem esta palhaçada toda?? que bem utilizados que estão a ser os nossos impostos fds

Entre os advogados (3 pelo que dizem), está uma manhosa que conseguiu ilibar a uns anos uma inspectora da PJ acusada de matar a sogra com uma data de tiros.. este vai pelo mesmo caminho.

 

Nem tenho palavras para descrever esta situação.. mas uma coisa é certa a PJ e GNR foram bem fdds com esta história, telefonema em directo para o próprio director da PJ..que vergonha de país.. ou muito me engano ou os advogados já engendraram uma história tal que o tipo com jeitinho nem preso vai tal é o estado de vítima que querem fazer parecer.. que vergonha :ranting:

O que só prova que é uma ópitma advogada. Mas a gaja só se safou no recurso, se não me engano...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Epah, basta abrir o link que aqui puseste, andar para cima uns pixeis e vês logo que lhe foi reduzida a pena, ainda em 2013. Isso foi uma novidade na altura.

Agora, 3 anos passados, não podem já ter reduzido a pena outra vez? Ou quem sabe, ter deixado o sr. sair por bom comportamento?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Quote

 

Forced Transgender Boy Quickly Returns To Normal After Removal From Mother’s Care

ISRAEL-GAY-PRIDE

A seven-year-old boy has been removed from his mother’s care by the high court, after he was found to be suffering “significant emotional harm” due to his mother raising him as a girl.

The judge in the case slammed social services who had simply accepted that the boy should be treated as a girl.

The High Court judge hearing the case, Mr Justice Hayden, told the court that he believed the mother had been “absolutely convinced” that the boy “perceived himself as a girl” and was therefore determined to treat him as a girl, according to reports.

However, the boy, who cannot be named and is now living with his father, has naturally reverted to having masculine interests since leaving the care of his mother, the court heard.

Family court proceedings began about three years ago after the father raised a complaint that he was not allowed access to his son. A lower-ranking judge authorised a “wide ranging” inquiry forcing local authority social services staff to begin investigations.

Justice Hayden said “flares of concern” for the boy’s wellbeing had been raised by a “whole raft of multi-disciplinary agencies”, and that he couldn’t understand why social services had “disregarded so summarily” those concerns.

 

He said social services staff had “moved into wholesale acceptance that [the boy] should be regarded as a girl”. He called on council to undertake a review of the “social work response” to the case; a council spokesperson said a review was already underway.

The judge considered evidence from boy’s parents, local authority social workers and a psychologist to make his ruling.

In his ruling, Justice Hayden said that the boy’s mother “told me that [he] was ‘living in stealth’ by which was meant, she explained, that he was living life entirely as a girl.

“He dressed, at all times, like a girl and, it transpired, had been registered at a new general practitioner’s as a girl.

“I was also left in no doubt that [the mother] was absolutely convinced that [the boy] perceived himself as a girl.”

Justice Hayden added that his “overwhelming impression” was that the mother “believes herself to be to fighting for [her son’s] right to express himself as a girl”.

The woman had told him that the boy “expressed disdain for his penis”, he said, adding: “I consider that [the mother] has caused significant emotional harm to [her son] in her active determination that he should be a girl.”

Justice Hayden commented upon the fact that the boy had settled in well with his father and his father’s partner, actively choosing, with no pressure from either adult, to pursue interests typically seen as masculine.

“I have been told that [the father] and his partner were shocked when they first saw [the boy] by the extent to which he appeared to be a girl, both in appearance and in mannerism,” said the judge. “However, what is striking is how well [the boy] has settled down.

“I have noted from reports that [the boy] has become interested in Power Rangers, SpongeBob, superheroes and is constantly finding new interests … It is striking that most of [the boy’s] interests are male-oriented.

He concluded: “I am entirely satisfied, both on the basis of the reports and [the father’s] evidence at this hearing, that he has brought no pressure on [the boy] to pursue masculine interests. [The boy’s] interests and energy are entirely self-motivated.”

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Stone locked and unlocked this topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.