Jump to content

Dreamworks Ameaça Torrents (shrek 2)


Prym3r
 Share

Recommended Posts

you should please go sodomize yourself with retractable batons

Dreamworks doesn't like us... :- )

Mail da Dreamworks para o site http://thepiratebay.org/

From [email protected] Sat Aug 21 18:22:16 2004

Received: from pimout3-ext.prodigy.net (207.115.63.102)

Received: from rome1.prodigy.net (rome1-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.61.11])

by pimout3-ext.prodigy.net (8.12.10 milter /8.12.10) with SMTP id

    i7NI2A3d028034;

Mon, 23 Aug 2004 14:02:16 -0400

Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 14:02:08 -0500

From: [email protected]

To: [email protected]

Subject: Unauthorized Use of DreamWorks SKG Properties

Dennis L. Wilson, Esq.

KEATS McFARLAND & WILSON, LLP

9720 Wilshire Blvd., Penthouse Suite

Beverly Hills, CA 90212

Tel: (310) 248-3830

Fax: (310) 860-0363

August 23, 2004

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL

AND U.S. MAIL

ThePirateBay.org

Box 1206

Stockholm 11479

SWEDEN

[email protected]

Re: Unauthorized Use of DreamWorks SKG Properties

  http://www.thepiratebay.org

To Whom It May Concern:

This letter is being written to you on behalf of our

client, DreamWorks SKG (hereinafter ^ÓDreamWorks^Ô). 

DreamWorks is the exclusive owner of all copyright,

trademark and other intellectual property rights in

and to the ^ÓShrek 2^Ô motion picture.  No one is

authorized to copy, reproduce, distribute, or

otherwise use the ^ÓShrek 2^Ô motion picture without

the express written permission of DreamWorks.

It has come to our attention that the web site

located at ^Óhttp://www.thepiratebay.org,^Ô for which

you are the service provider, is reproducing,

distributing, and/or offering for sale the ^ÓShrek 2^Ô

motion picture.  Attached hereto are photocopies of

representative pages from the aforementioned web site.

DreamWorks has the good faith belief that the use of

the material in the manner complained of is not

authorized by DreamWorks, its agent or the law. 

DreamWorks diligently enforces its rights in

the ^ÓShrek 2^Ô motion picture in all forms of media. 

Our client rightfully takes its responsibility for

the protection of the ^ÓShrek 2^Ô motion picture very

seriously.

As you may be aware, Internet Service Providers can

be held liable if they do not respond to claims of

infringement pursuant to the requirements of the

Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA).  In

accordance with the DMCA, we request your assistance

in the removal of infringements of the ^ÓShrek 2^Ô

motion picture from this web site and any other sites

for which you act as an Internet Service Provider. 

We further declare under penalty of perjury that we

are authorized to act on behalf of DreamWorks and

that the information in this letter is accurate. 

Please contact me immediately to discuss this matter

further.

Nothing contained in this letter constitutes an

express or implied waiver of any rights, remedies or

defenses of DreamWorks, all of which are expressly

reserved.

Very truly yours,

Dennis L. Wilson

Keats McFarland & Wilson LLP

DLW:al

Enclosures (via mail)

cc: DreamWorks SKG

Resposta da Pirate Bay :

Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 18:21:43 -0100 (GMT)

From: anakata

To: [email protected]

Subject: Re: Unauthorized Use of DreamWorks SKG Properties

On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 [email protected] wrote:

> Dennis L. Wilson, Esq.

> KEATS McFARLAND & WILSON, LLP

> 9720 Wilshire Blvd., Penthouse Suite

> Beverly Hills, CA 90212

> Tel: (310) 248-3830

> Fax: (310) 860-0363

>

>

> August 23, 2004

>

>

> VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL

> AND U.S. MAIL

>

> ThePirateBay.org

> Box 1206

> Stockholm 11479

> SWEDEN

>

> [email protected]

>

> Re: Unauthorized Use of DreamWorks SKG Properties

>   http://www.thepiratebay.org

>

> To Whom It May Concern:

>

> This letter is being written to you on behalf of our

> client, DreamWorks SKG (hereinafter ^ÓDreamWorks^Ô).

> DreamWorks is the exclusive owner of all copyright,

> trademark and other intellectual property rights in

> and to the ^ÓShrek 2^Ô motion picture.  No one is

> authorized to copy, reproduce, distribute, or

> otherwise use the ^ÓShrek 2^Ô motion picture without

> the express written permission of DreamWorks.

[...]

> As you may be aware, Internet Service Providers can

> be held liable if they do not respond to claims of

> infringement pursuant to the requirements of the

> Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA).  In

> accordance with the DMCA, we request your assistance

> in the removal of infringements of the ^ÓShrek 2^Ô

> motion picture from this web site and any other sites

> for which you act as an Internet Service Provider.

> We further declare under penalty of perjury that we

> are authorized to act on behalf of DreamWorks and

> that the information in this letter is accurate.

> Please contact me immediately to discuss this matter

> further.

As you may or may not be aware, Sweden is not a state in the United States

of America. Sweden is a country in northern Europe.

Unless you figured it out by now, US law does not apply here.

For your information, no Swedish law is being violated.

Please be assured that any further contact with us, regardless of medium,

will result in

a) a suit being filed for harassment

B) a formal complaint lodged with the bar of your legal counsel, for

sending frivolous legal threats.

It is the opinion of us and our lawyers that you are fucking morons, and

that you should please go sodomize yourself with retractable batons.

Please also note that your e-mail and letter will be published in full on

http://www.thepiratebay.org.

Go fuck yourself.

Polite as usual,

anakata

:lol: :lol: :lol:

dreamworks1.jpg

dreamworks2.jpg

dreamworks3.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Acho que o tipo do piratebay deve ter 12 anos. Tem piada mas é tudo menos racional. Desde quando é que é legal piratear na Suécia?

Se fosse a ele informava-me melhor sobre o Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Só lhe ficava bem... e era gajo para suar uns quilos.

On October 12, 1998, the U.S. Congress passed the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, ending many months of turbulent negotiations regarding its provisions. Two weeks later, on October 28th, President Clinton signed the Act into law.

The Act is designed to implement the treaties signed in December 1996 at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Geneva conference, but also contains additional provisions addressing related matters.

As was the case with the 'No Electronic Theft' Act (1997), the bill was originally supported by the software and entertainment industries, and opposed by scientists, librarians, and academics.

Highlights Generally:

·      Makes it a crime to circumvent anti-piracy measures built into most commercial software.

·      Outlaws the manufacture, sale, or distribution of code-cracking devices used to illegally copy software.

·      Does permit the cracking of copyright protection devices, however, to conduct encryption research, assess product interoperability, and test computer security systems.

·      Provides exemptions from anti-circumvention provisions for nonprofit libraries, archives, and educational institutions under certain circumstances.

·      In general, limits Internet service providers from copyright infringement liability for simply transmitting information over the Internet.

·      Service providers, however, are expected to remove material from users' web sites that appears to constitute copyright infringement.

·      Limits liability of nonprofit institutions of higher education -- when they serve as online service providers and under certain circumstances -- for copyright infringement by faculty members or graduate students.

·      Requires that "webcasters" pay licensing fees to record companies.

·      Requires that the Register of Copyrights, after consultation with relevant parties, submit to Congress recommendations regarding how to promote distance education through digital technologies while "maintaining an appropriate balance between the rights of copyright owners and the needs of users."

·      States explicitly that "[n]othing in this section shall affect rights, remedies, limitations, or defenses to copyright infringement, including fair use..."

Edited by RiK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.